The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Spontaneous Supercrystal Formation During a Strain‐Engineered Metal–Insulator Transition
|
---|---|
Published in |
Advanced Materials, June 2024
|
DOI | 10.1002/adma.202403873 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Oleg Yu. Gorobtsov, Ludi Miao, Ziming Shao, Yueze Tan, Noah Schnitzer, Berit Hansen Goodge, Jacob Ruf, Daniel Weinstock, Mathew Cherukara, Martin Victor Holt, Hari Nair, Long‐Qing Chen, Lena Fitting Kourkoutis, Darrell G. Schlom, Kyle M. Shen, Andrej Singer |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 67% |
Researcher | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Physics and Astronomy | 4 | 67% |
Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2024.
All research outputs
#969,570
of 26,396,170 outputs
Outputs from Advanced Materials
#1,005
of 19,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,715
of 257,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advanced Materials
#13
of 756 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,396,170 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,250 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,248 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 756 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.