The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Defining angioinvasion and lymphatic invasion in papillary thyroid carcinoma: morphological criteria, utility of D2‐40/CD31/ERG immunohistochemistry and correlation with clinicopathological characteristics
|
---|---|
Published in |
Histopathology, July 2024
|
DOI | 10.1111/his.15285 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Bin Xu, Dibisha Roy, Rene Serrette, Ronald Ghossein |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 15 | 65% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 17% |
Scientists | 3 | 13% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2024.
All research outputs
#2,903,827
of 26,371,446 outputs
Outputs from Histopathology
#246
of 3,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,208
of 162,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Histopathology
#4
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,371,446 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,592 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 162,132 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.