The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Physical therapy in the ICU practice makes perfect – Where to go from competency to capability?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Intensive & Critical Care Nursing, July 2024
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.iccn.2024.103772 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Paul Twose, Sabrina Eggmann |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 11% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 16 | 84% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 12 | 63% |
Scientists | 4 | 21% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2024.
All research outputs
#3,417,196
of 26,538,769 outputs
Outputs from Intensive & Critical Care Nursing
#250
of 1,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,857
of 269,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive & Critical Care Nursing
#2
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,538,769 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,174 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,810 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.