The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Historical reconstructions of California wildfires vary by data source
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Wildland Fire, October 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1071/wf16050 |
| Authors |
Alexandra D. Syphard, Jon E. Keeley |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 52 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 31% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 4% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 12 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 19 | 37% |
| Engineering | 5 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 6% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 17 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2017.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Wildland Fire
#406
of 848 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,798
of 323,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Wildland Fire
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 848 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,147 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.