The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Significant challenges to the sustainability of the California coast considering climate change
|
---|---|
Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, July 2024
|
DOI | 10.1073/pnas.2310077121 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Karen M. Thorne, Glen M. MacDonald, Francisco P. Chavez, Richard F. Ambrose, Patrick L. Barnard |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 2 | 17% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 17% |
Professor | 1 | 8% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 8% |
Lecturer | 1 | 8% |
Other | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 4 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 25% |
Engineering | 2 | 17% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 17% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 4 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2024.
All research outputs
#1,262,633
of 26,503,921 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#18,075
of 105,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,179
of 199,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#151
of 554 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,503,921 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 105,086 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,260 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 554 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.