↓ Skip to main content

Mechanical circulatory support devices in adults with congenital heart disease

Overview of attention for article published in Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation, August 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mechanical circulatory support devices in adults with congenital heart disease
Published in
Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation, August 2024
DOI 10.1097/mot.0000000000001165
Pubmed ID
Authors

Deen L. Garba, Susan Joseph, Ari Cedars

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2024.
All research outputs
#7,375,231
of 26,588,416 outputs
Outputs from Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation
#120
of 918 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,040
of 233,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,588,416 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 918 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 233,297 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them