↓ Skip to main content

Rapid Quantification of Escherichia coli as an Indicator of Food Contamination Using Fluorescence in situ Hybridization with Filter Cultivation (FISHFC)

Overview of attention for article published in Nippon Shokuhin Kagaku Kogaku Kaishi, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rapid Quantification of Escherichia coli as an Indicator of Food Contamination Using Fluorescence in situ Hybridization with Filter Cultivation (FISHFC)
Published in
Nippon Shokuhin Kagaku Kogaku Kaishi, January 2011
DOI 10.3136/nskkk.58.483
Authors

Ryohei Aoi, Shigemasa Shimizu, Koji Yamazaki, Tomoo Sawabe, Yuji Kawai

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2013.
All research outputs
#6,907,530
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from Nippon Shokuhin Kagaku Kogaku Kaishi
#73
of 675 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,303
of 192,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nippon Shokuhin Kagaku Kogaku Kaishi
#5
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 675 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,923 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.