The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Plastic induced urinary tract disease and dysfunction: a scoping review
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology, August 2024
|
DOI | 10.1038/s41370-024-00709-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Liam O’Callaghan, Matthew Olsen, Lotti Tajouri, Davinia Beaver, Carly Hudson, Rashed Alghafri, Simon McKirdy, Adrian Goldsworthy |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 6 | 21% |
Chile | 5 | 18% |
Canada | 1 | 4% |
Timor-Leste | 1 | 4% |
Australia | 1 | 4% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
India | 1 | 4% |
Germany | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 11 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 21 | 75% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 14% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 7% |
Scientists | 1 | 4% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2024.
All research outputs
#902,680
of 26,595,441 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology
#108
of 1,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,266
of 212,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology
#4
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,595,441 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,410 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,588 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.