The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
3D imaging photocatalytically degraded micro- and nanoplastics
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nanotechnology, July 2024
|
DOI | 10.1088/1361-6528/ad5dc5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Aleksander Cholewinski, Joseph Wortman, Misa Hayashida, William A Anderson, Boxin Zhao |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 2 | 33% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 33% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 17% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 2 | 33% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 17% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 17% |
Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 17% |
Engineering | 1 | 17% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 99. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2024.
All research outputs
#460,873
of 26,756,610 outputs
Outputs from Nanotechnology
#11
of 4,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,296
of 308,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nanotechnology
#1
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,756,610 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,909 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,267 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.