The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
How do Japanese students think about the credibility of Wikipedia and use Wikipedia in their learning?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Joho Chishiki Gakkaishi, January 2016
|
DOI | 10.2964/jsik_2016_019 |
Authors |
Sho SATO, Ranko IDE, Saki OTA, Naoki HAYASHI, Kana MICHIURA, Saori SOEDA |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2017.
All research outputs
#3,226,705
of 24,357,902 outputs
Outputs from Joho Chishiki Gakkaishi
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,689
of 402,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Joho Chishiki Gakkaishi
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,357,902 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 247.4. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,733 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them