The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Technical Communication's Fight Against Extractive Large Language Modeling by Applying FAIR and CARE Principles of Data
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Business and Technical Communication, September 2024
|
DOI | 10.1177/10506519241280587 |
Authors |
Chris A. Lindgren, Erin Yunes, Cana Uluak Itchuaqiyaq |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 6 | 40% |
Nepal | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 8 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 47% |
Scientists | 6 | 40% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2024.
All research outputs
#3,156,656
of 26,680,103 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Business and Technical Communication
#17
of 202 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,730
of 139,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Business and Technical Communication
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,680,103 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 202 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 139,807 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them