You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Fluid inclusion and vitrinite-reflectance geothermometry compared to heat-flow models of maximum paleotemperature next to dikes, western onshore Gippsland Basin, Australia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Coal Geology, September 1998
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s0166-5162(98)00018-4 |
| Authors |
Charles E. Barker, Yvonne Bone, Michael D. Lewan |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 2 | 5% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 37 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 19% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 14% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 10% |
| Other | 6 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 29 | 69% |
| Energy | 2 | 5% |
| Engineering | 1 | 2% |
| Design | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 9 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2022.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Coal Geology
#121
of 484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,000
of 31,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Coal Geology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 484 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 31,202 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them