The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Transplantation of human pluripotent stem cell-derived retinal sheet in a primate model of macular hole
|
---|---|
Published in |
Stem Cell Reports, September 2024
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.stemcr.2024.09.002 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yasuaki Iwama, Yasuko Sugase-Miyamoto, Kenta Onoue, Hirofumi Uyama, Keiji Matsuda, Kazuko Hayashi, Ryutaro Akiba, Tomohiro Masuda, Satoshi Yokota, Shigenobu Yonemura, Kohji Nishida, Masayo Takahashi, Yasuo Kurimoto, Michiko Mandai |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Hong Kong | 1 | 20% |
Australia | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 518. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2024.
All research outputs
#53,089
of 26,799,545 outputs
Outputs from Stem Cell Reports
#7
of 2,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#474
of 213,214 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Stem Cell Reports
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,799,545 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,211 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,214 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.