↓ Skip to main content

Weakening the effect of boundaries: “diffusion-free” boundary conditions as a “do least harm” alternative to Neumann

Overview of attention for article published in Geophysical & Astrophysical Fluid Dynamics, October 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Weakening the effect of boundaries: “diffusion-free” boundary conditions as a “do least harm” alternative to Neumann
Published in
Geophysical & Astrophysical Fluid Dynamics, October 2024
DOI 10.1080/03091929.2024.2403759
Authors

Yufeng Lin, Rich R. Kerswell

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2024.
All research outputs
#18,340,873
of 26,813,756 outputs
Outputs from Geophysical & Astrophysical Fluid Dynamics
#63
of 122 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,665
of 143,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geophysical & Astrophysical Fluid Dynamics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,813,756 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 122 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 143,980 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them