The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Bio-inspired Janus composite nanoscrolls for on-demand tumour targeting
|
---|---|
Published in |
RSC Advances, January 2016
|
DOI | 10.1039/c5ra27080d |
Authors |
Jeong-Hwan Kim, Tsai-Ming Lu |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 42% |
Professor | 2 | 17% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 17% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 2 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 3 | 25% |
Chemistry | 2 | 17% |
Materials Science | 2 | 17% |
Sports and Recreations | 1 | 8% |
Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
Other | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 2 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2017.
All research outputs
#7,524,294
of 22,962,258 outputs
Outputs from RSC Advances
#2,375
of 12,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,654
of 394,330 outputs
Outputs of similar age from RSC Advances
#269
of 1,627 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,962,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,131 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 394,330 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,627 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.