The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Integrated species distribution models: combining presence‐background data and site‐occupancy data with imperfect detection
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Methods in Ecology and Evolution, April 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1111/2041-210x.12738 |
| Authors |
Vira Koshkina, Yan Wang, Ascelin Gordon, Robert M. Dorazio, Matt White, Lewi Stone |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 7% |
| Sierra Leone | 1 | 4% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 18 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 63% |
| Scientists | 9 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 439 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 427 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 103 | 23% |
| Researcher | 91 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 63 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 6% |
| Other | 24 | 5% |
| Other | 65 | 15% |
| Unknown | 65 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 190 | 43% |
| Environmental Science | 116 | 26% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 10 | 2% |
| Mathematics | 7 | 2% |
| Engineering | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 28 | 6% |
| Unknown | 81 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2024.
All research outputs
#1,820,711
of 26,508,329 outputs
Outputs from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#783
of 2,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,166
of 329,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#29
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,508,329 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,522 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,485 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.