The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Long‐term and widespread changes in agricultural practices influence ring‐necked pheasant abundance in California
|
---|---|
Published in |
Ecology and Evolution, March 2017
|
DOI | 10.1002/ece3.2675 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Peter S. Coates, Brianne E. Brussee, Kristy B. Howe, Joseph P. Fleskes, Ian A. Dwight, Daniel P. Connelly, Matt G. Meshriy, Scott C. Gardner |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 10 | 33% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 17% |
Student > Master | 4 | 13% |
Professor | 3 | 10% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Unknown | 4 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 30% |
Environmental Science | 7 | 23% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Unknown | 9 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2020.
All research outputs
#7,538,708
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Ecology and Evolution
#4,092
of 8,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,565
of 325,172 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecology and Evolution
#102
of 230 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,647 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,172 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 230 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.