You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
EFFECTS OF CONIFERS AND ELK BROWSING ON QUAKING ASPEN FORESTS IN THE CENTRAL ROCKY MOUNTAINS, USA
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecological Applications, August 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1890/03-5395 |
| Authors |
Margot W. Kaye, Dan Binkley, Thomas J. Stohlgren |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 7% |
| Peru | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 69 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 7% |
| Professor | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 12 | 16% |
| Unknown | 10 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 31 | 41% |
| Environmental Science | 24 | 32% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 1% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 15 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2018.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Applications
#1,854
of 3,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,587
of 68,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Applications
#7
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,326 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.5. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 68,155 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.