The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
視点 くまのプーさん:新たなる旅立ち
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Information Processing & Management / Joho Kanri, May 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1241/johokanri.60.128 |
| Authors |
福井 健策 |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 6 | 26% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 16 | 70% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 87% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2021.
All research outputs
#1,762,377
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Information Processing & Management / Joho Kanri
#49
of 954 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,536
of 325,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Information Processing & Management / Joho Kanri
#3
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 954 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,755 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.