The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
『鳥ノ記念日』ニ就テ
|
---|---|
Published in |
Japanese Journal of Ornithology, February 2009
|
DOI | 10.3838/jjo1915.1.3 |
Authors |
渡瀬 庄三郎 |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Korea, Republic of | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 16 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 17 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2018.
All research outputs
#2,414,283
of 26,495,046 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Ornithology
#10
of 313 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,312
of 112,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Ornithology
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,495,046 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 313 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 112,511 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.