↓ Skip to main content

日本における排外主義運動とその中国・韓国・北朝鮮観—新旧保守メディアの比較から

Overview of attention for article published in Asian Studies, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#5 of 129)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
日本における排外主義運動とその中国・韓国・北朝鮮観—新旧保守メディアの比較から
Published in
Asian Studies, May 2016
DOI 10.11479/asianstudies.62.2_18
Authors

宮城 佑輔

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2022.
All research outputs
#3,392,794
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Asian Studies
#5
of 129 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,720
of 343,701 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Asian Studies
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 129 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,701 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them