↓ Skip to main content

What Makes a Natural Clay Antibacterial?

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Science & Technology, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
4 patents
facebook
3 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
170 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
172 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
What Makes a Natural Clay Antibacterial?
Published in
Environmental Science & Technology, March 2011
DOI 10.1021/es1040688
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lynda B. Williams, David W. Metge, Dennis D. Eberl, Ronald W. Harvey, Amanda G. Turner, Panjai Prapaipong, Amisha T. Poret-Peterson

Abstract

Natural clays have been used in ancient and modern medicine, but the mechanism(s) that make certain clays lethal against bacterial pathogens has not been identified. We have compared the depositional environments, mineralogies, and chemistries of clays that exhibit antibacterial effects on a broad spectrum of human pathogens including antibiotic resistant strains. Natural antibacterial clays contain nanoscale (<200 nm), illite-smectite and reduced iron phases. The role of clay minerals in the bactericidal process is to buffer the aqueous pH and oxidation state to conditions that promote Fe(2+) solubility. Chemical analyses of E. coli killed by aqueous leachates of an antibacterial clay show that intracellular concentrations of Fe and P are elevated relative to controls. Phosphorus uptake by the cells supports a regulatory role of polyphosphate or phospholipids in controlling Fe(2+). Fenton reaction products can degrade critical cell components, but we deduce that extracellular processes do not cause cell death. Rather, Fe(2+) overwhelms outer membrane regulatory proteins and is oxidized when it enters the cell, precipitating Fe(3+) and producing lethal hydroxyl radicals.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 163 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 39 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 16%
Student > Master 15 9%
Student > Bachelor 15 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 31 18%
Unknown 34 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 15%
Chemistry 20 12%
Environmental Science 18 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 6%
Engineering 10 6%
Other 38 22%
Unknown 51 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2023.
All research outputs
#3,549,741
of 26,119,990 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science & Technology
#4,160
of 21,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,528
of 130,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science & Technology
#33
of 150 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,119,990 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,410 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,832 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 150 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.