↓ Skip to main content

Efficacy of Bofu‐tsusho‐san, an oriental herbal medicine, in obese Japanese women with impaired glucose tolerance

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical & Experimental Pharmacology & Physiology, October 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
85 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Efficacy of Bofu‐tsusho‐san, an oriental herbal medicine, in obese Japanese women with impaired glucose tolerance
Published in
Clinical & Experimental Pharmacology & Physiology, October 2004
DOI 10.1111/j.1440-1681.2004.04056.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chizuko Hioki, Kanji Yoshimoto, Toshihide Yoshida

Abstract

1. In the present study, we conducted the first randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of bofu-tsusho-san (BF), an oriental herbal medicine (24 mg/day ephedrine in Ephedrae Herba and an efficacy equivalent of 280 mg caffeine, judging from the phosphodiesterase-inhibitory effect of Glycyrrhizae Radix, Forsythiae Fructus and Schizonepetae Spica and another 14 crude drugs) in obese women with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT). 2. The aim of the present study was to determine whether BF was effective in decreasing visceral adiposity and insulin resistance. Eighty-one Japanese women (body mass index (BMI) 36.5 +/- 4.8 kg/m2) with IGT and insulin resistance (IR), who had been treated with a low-calorie diet (5016 kj/day: 1200 kcal) and an exercise regimen (1254 kj/day: 300 kcal), were randomized to receive either placebo (n=40) or BF treatment (n=41) three times a day. 3. After 24 weeks treatment, the BF group lost significantly (P <0.01) more bodyweight and abdominal visceral fat without a decrease in the adjusted resting metabolic rate (RMR), whereas the placebo group lost bodyweight (P <0.05) and had no significant change in abdominal visceral fat. The BF group had a lower fasting serum insulin level (P <0.05), a lower insulin area under the curve (P <0.05) and a lower level of the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (P <0.01) compared with values before treatment. 4. We conclude that BF could be a useful herbal medicine in treating obesity with IGT.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 113 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 18%
Researcher 13 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 9%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Student > Postgraduate 6 5%
Other 17 15%
Unknown 39 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 16%
Sports and Recreations 7 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 5%
Psychology 4 3%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 47 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2023.
All research outputs
#3,508,116
of 26,484,134 outputs
Outputs from Clinical & Experimental Pharmacology & Physiology
#72
of 1,437 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,338
of 77,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical & Experimental Pharmacology & Physiology
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,484,134 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,437 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 77,975 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them