You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
小児腎移植患者におけるtacrolimusの徐放性製剤への変更時の薬物動態の検討
|
---|---|
Published in |
Japanese Journal of Transplantation, October 2014
|
DOI | 10.11386/jst.48.042 |
Authors |
兵頭 洋二, 宍戸 清一郎, 河村 毅, 櫻林 啓, 新津 靖雄, 二瓶 大, 青木 裕次郎, 村松 真樹, 酒井 謙, 相川 厚 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2017.
All research outputs
#21,048,638
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Transplantation
#18
of 22 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#196,349
of 266,996 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Transplantation
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.6. This one scored the same or higher as 4 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,996 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them