↓ Skip to main content

[Music Processing in the Brain: Neuropsychological Approach Through Findings of Patients with Amusia].

Overview of attention for article published in Brain and nerve Shinkei kenkyū no shinpo, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
[Music Processing in the Brain: Neuropsychological Approach Through Findings of Patients with Amusia].
Published in
Brain and nerve Shinkei kenkyū no shinpo, June 2017
DOI 10.11477/mf.1416200793
Pubmed ID
Authors

Masayuki Satoh

Abstract

Less than 100 cases of amusia have been reported. The sites of lesion in these patients have been located in the right, left, and bilateral cerebral hemisphere(s); therefore the lateralization of amusia is not as clear as that of aphasia. Among them, pure amusia, the selective loss of musical ability due to acquired brain damage, was observed only in nine cases. The cases of pure amusia included right superior and middle temporal gyrus lesion involvement. By comparing the lesion sites and symptoms of pure amusia, it might be assumed that the right superior/middle temporal gyrus participates in the perception and expression of melody. In 2011, the selective loss of the experience of musical emotion was termed musical anhedonia by the presenting author. Only four cases of musical anhedonia have been reported, and in those the cortical and subcortical regions of the right temporoparietal area were commonly damaged. It was supposed that musical anhedonia was caused by the disconnection between the right auditory association cortices and the insula. Based on the results of the assessment of healthy young participants, there have been many reports of congenital amusia or musical anhedonia by musical psychologists. Further studies are needed in order to determine whether these diseases actually exist.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 4 40%
Student > Bachelor 1 10%
Researcher 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Unknown 3 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 3 30%
Neuroscience 2 20%
Social Sciences 1 10%
Computer Science 1 10%
Unknown 3 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2017.
All research outputs
#16,725,651
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Brain and nerve Shinkei kenkyū no shinpo
#206
of 499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200,460
of 330,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain and nerve Shinkei kenkyū no shinpo
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 499 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,503 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.