↓ Skip to main content

Critical roles of nardilysin in the maintenance of body temperature homoeostasis

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Critical roles of nardilysin in the maintenance of body temperature homoeostasis
Published in
Nature Communications, February 2014
DOI 10.1038/ncomms4224
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yoshinori Hiraoka, Tatsuhiko Matsuoka, Mikiko Ohno, Kazuhiro Nakamura, Sayaka Saijo, Shigenobu Matsumura, Kiyoto Nishi, Jiro Sakamoto, Po-Min Chen, Kazuo Inoue, Tohru Fushiki, Toru Kita, Takeshi Kimura, Eiichiro Nishi

Abstract

Body temperature homoeostasis in mammals is governed centrally through the regulation of shivering and non-shivering thermogenesis and cutaneous vasomotion. Non-shivering thermogenesis in brown adipose tissue (BAT) is mediated by sympathetic activation, followed by PGC-1α induction, which drives UCP1. Here we identify nardilysin (Nrd1 and NRDc) as a critical regulator of body temperature homoeostasis. Nrd1(-/-) mice show increased energy expenditure owing to enhanced BAT thermogenesis and hyperactivity. Despite these findings, Nrd1(-/-) mice show hypothermia and cold intolerance that are attributed to the lowered set point of body temperature, poor insulation and impaired cold-induced thermogenesis. Induction of β3-adrenergic receptor, PGC-1α and UCP1 in response to cold is severely impaired in the absence of NRDc. At the molecular level, NRDc and PGC-1α interact and co-localize at the UCP1 enhancer, where NRDc represses PGC-1α activity. These findings reveal a novel nuclear function of NRDc and provide important insights into the mechanism of thermoregulation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
India 1 2%
Unknown 64 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 23%
Other 5 8%
Student > Master 4 6%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 11 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 17%
Neuroscience 3 5%
Chemistry 3 5%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 13 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2014.
All research outputs
#6,717,418
of 24,940,046 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#39,260
of 54,625 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,804
of 319,826 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#264
of 424 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,940,046 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 54,625 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.8. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,826 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 424 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.