↓ Skip to main content

MECHANISMS OF POPULATION DIFFERENTIATION IN MARBLED MURRELETS: HISTORICAL VERSUS CONTEMPORARY PROCESSES

Overview of attention for article published in Evolution, January 2000
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
MECHANISMS OF POPULATION DIFFERENTIATION IN MARBLED MURRELETS: HISTORICAL VERSUS CONTEMPORARY PROCESSES
Published in
Evolution, January 2000
DOI 10.1554/0014-3820(2000)054[0974:mopdim]2.3.co;2
Authors

Bradley C. Congdon, John F. Piatt, Kathy Martin, Vicki L. Friesen

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Romania 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 84 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 12%
Researcher 10 11%
Student > Master 8 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 3%
Professor 2 2%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 52 58%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Environmental Science 3 3%
Unknown 52 58%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2006.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Evolution
#2,816
of 5,879 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,910
of 109,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Evolution
#6
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,879 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,782 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.