↓ Skip to main content

Control of hot-carrier relaxation for realizing ideal quantum-dot intermediate-band solar cells

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Control of hot-carrier relaxation for realizing ideal quantum-dot intermediate-band solar cells
Published in
Scientific Reports, February 2014
DOI 10.1038/srep04125
Pubmed ID
Authors

David M. Tex, Itaru Kamiya, Yoshihiko Kanemitsu

Abstract

For intermediate-band solar cells, the broad absorption spectrum of quantum dots (QDs) offers a favorable conversion efficiency, and photocurrent generation via efficient two-step two-photon-absorption (TS-TPA) in QDs is essential for realizing high-performance solar cells. In the last decade, many works were dedicated to improve the TS-TPA efficiency by modifying the QD itself, however, the obtained results are far from the requirements for practical applications. To reveal the mechanisms behind the low TS-TPA efficiency in QDs, we report here on two- and three-beam photocurrent measurements of InAs quantum structures embedded in AlGaAs. Comparison of two- and three-beam photocurrent spectra obtained by subbandgap excitation reveals that the QD TS-TPA efficiency is improved significantly by suppressing the relaxation of hot TS-TPA carriers to unoccupied shallow InAs quantum structure states.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 2 6%
Germany 1 3%
United Kingdom 1 3%
Unknown 29 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 24%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 18%
Lecturer 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 6 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 13 39%
Materials Science 5 15%
Engineering 3 9%
Chemistry 2 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 8 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2014.
All research outputs
#16,272,496
of 26,160,558 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#77,246
of 145,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,142
of 240,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#393
of 825 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,160,558 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 145,287 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.9. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,291 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 825 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.