The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 106 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Plant diversity increases with the strength of negative density dependence at the global scale
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science, June 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1126/science.aam5678 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joseph A LaManna, Scott A Mangan, Alfonso Alonso, Norman A Bourg, Warren Y Brockelman, Sarayudh Bunyavejchewin, Li-Wan Chang, Jyh-Min Chiang, George B Chuyong, Keith Clay, Richard Condit, Susan Cordell, Stuart J Davies, Tucker J Furniss, Christian P Giardina, I A U Nimal Gunatilleke, C V Savitri Gunatilleke, Fangliang He, Robert W Howe, Stephen P Hubbell, Chang-Fu Hsieh, Faith M Inman-Narahari, David Janík, Daniel J Johnson, David Kenfack, Lisa Korte, Kamil Král, Andrew J Larson, James A Lutz, Sean M McMahon, William J McShea, Hervé R Memiaghe, Anuttara Nathalang, Vojtech Novotny, Perry S Ong, David A Orwig, Rebecca Ostertag, Geoffrey G Parker, Richard P Phillips, Lawren Sack, I-Fang Sun, J Sebastián Tello, Duncan W Thomas, Benjamin L Turner, Dilys M Vela Díaz, Tomáš Vrška, George D Weiblen, Amy Wolf, Sandra Yap, Jonathan A Myers |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 14 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 4% |
| Canada | 3 | 3% |
| Czechia | 2 | 2% |
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| Thailand | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Unknown | 68 | 64% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 68 | 64% |
| Scientists | 34 | 32% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 498 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 493 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 110 | 22% |
| Researcher | 105 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 51 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 41 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 25 | 5% |
| Other | 80 | 16% |
| Unknown | 86 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 218 | 44% |
| Environmental Science | 115 | 23% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 11 | 2% |
| Arts and Humanities | 6 | 1% |
| Other | 20 | 4% |
| Unknown | 113 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 141. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2023.
All research outputs
#314,677
of 26,522,772 outputs
Outputs from Science
#8,267
of 84,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,379
of 333,598 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#198
of 1,201 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,522,772 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 84,136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 66.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,598 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,201 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.