The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Use of weather types to disaggregate general circulation model predictions
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Geophysical Research, September 2012
|
DOI | 10.1029/91jd01695 |
Authors |
Lauren E. Hay, Gregory J. McCabe, David M. Wolock, Mark A. Ayers |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
South Africa | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 11 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 4 | 33% |
Student > Master | 3 | 25% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 17% |
Professor | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 2 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 42% |
Environmental Science | 4 | 33% |
Engineering | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 2 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2010.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Geophysical Research
#4,077
of 12,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,634
of 189,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Geophysical Research
#1,133
of 4,350 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,946 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,215 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,350 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.