The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A Formal Concept Analysis-Based Method for Developing Process Ontologies
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Chemical Engineering of Japan, June 2013
|
DOI | 10.1252/jcej.12we278 |
Authors |
Rafael Batres, Suriati Akmal |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 5 | 31% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 25% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 13% |
Student > Master | 2 | 13% |
Professor | 1 | 6% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 1 | 6% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 8 | 50% |
Computer Science | 3 | 19% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 6% |
Psychology | 1 | 6% |
Chemical Engineering | 1 | 6% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 2 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2017.
All research outputs
#17,636,985
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Chemical Engineering of Japan
#344
of 408 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,074
of 210,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Chemical Engineering of Japan
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 408 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,252 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them