The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The boundary model: A geographical analysis of design and conservation of nature reserves
|
---|---|
Published in |
Biological Conservation, January 1986
|
DOI | 10.1016/0006-3207(86)90057-1 |
Authors |
Christine M. Schonewald-Cox, Jonathan W. Bayless |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 3 | 4% |
Norway | 1 | 1% |
Israel | 1 | 1% |
Canada | 1 | 1% |
Argentina | 1 | 1% |
United States | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 71 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 25 | 32% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 22% |
Professor | 7 | 9% |
Student > Master | 6 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
Other | 10 | 13% |
Unknown | 9 | 11% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 34 | 43% |
Environmental Science | 23 | 29% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 5% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 3% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 3% |
Other | 4 | 5% |
Unknown | 10 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2010.
All research outputs
#8,870,392
of 26,345,808 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#4,027
of 6,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,555
of 41,787 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#8
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,345,808 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,447 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.4. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 41,787 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.