↓ Skip to main content

(書評)石川武著「「『同じゲヴェーレをもって』、占有か保障か―ザクセンシュピーゲル・ラント法二・四三・一の正しい解釈のために」(『北大法学論集』五二巻五号)」

Overview of attention for article published in Legal History Review, November 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
(書評)石川武著「「『同じゲヴェーレをもって』、占有か保障か―ザクセンシュピーゲル・ラント法二・四三・一の正しい解釈のために」(『北大法学論集』五二巻五号)」
Published in
Legal History Review, November 2009
DOI 10.5955/jalha.2003.292
Authors

源河 達史

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2023.
All research outputs
#6,445,517
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from Legal History Review
#4
of 97 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,117
of 98,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Legal History Review
#1
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 97 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,167 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.