You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Microbiota-Dependent Crosstalk Between Macrophages and ILC3 Promotes Intestinal Homeostasis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1126/science.1249288 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Arthur Mortha, Aleksey Chudnovskiy, Daigo Hashimoto, Milena Bogunovic, Sean P. Spencer, Yasmine Belkaid, Miriam Merad |
| Abstract |
The intestinal microbiota and tissue-resident myeloid cells promote immune responses that maintain intestinal homeostasis in the host. However, the cellular cues that translate microbial signals into intestinal homeostasis remain unclear. Here, we show that deficient granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) production altered mononuclear phagocyte effector functions and led to reduced regulatory T cell (T(reg)) numbers and impaired oral tolerance. We observed that RORγt(+) innate lymphoid cells (ILCs) are the primary source of GM-CSF in the gut and that ILC-driven GM-CSF production was dependent on the ability of macrophages to sense microbial signals and produce interleukin-1β. Our findings reveal that commensal microbes promote a crosstalk between innate myeloid and lymphoid cells that leads to immune homeostasis in the intestine. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 45% |
| Portugal | 1 | 9% |
| Spain | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 64% |
| Scientists | 3 | 27% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 739 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 715 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 170 | 23% |
| Researcher | 145 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 84 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 56 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 35 | 5% |
| Other | 126 | 17% |
| Unknown | 123 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 216 | 29% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 192 | 26% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 75 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 73 | 10% |
| Neuroscience | 11 | 1% |
| Other | 34 | 5% |
| Unknown | 138 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2020.
All research outputs
#3,427,106
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Science
#35,902
of 83,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,854
of 239,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#327
of 840 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,593 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,823 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 840 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.