↓ Skip to main content

Debris flow initiation by runoff in a recently burned basin: Is grain‐by‐grain sediment bulking or en masse failure to blame?

Overview of attention for article published in Geophysical Research Letters, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
87 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Debris flow initiation by runoff in a recently burned basin: Is grain‐by‐grain sediment bulking or en masse failure to blame?
Published in
Geophysical Research Letters, July 2017
DOI 10.1002/2017gl074243
Authors

Luke A. McGuire, Francis K. Rengers, Jason W. Kean, Dennis M. Staley

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 80 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 25%
Researcher 10 13%
Student > Master 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Other 5 6%
Other 13 16%
Unknown 19 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 31 39%
Engineering 14 18%
Environmental Science 5 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Energy 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 24 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2017.
All research outputs
#21,879,071
of 24,411,829 outputs
Outputs from Geophysical Research Letters
#17,262
of 20,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#281,632
of 320,702 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geophysical Research Letters
#248
of 368 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,411,829 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,587 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,702 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 368 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.