↓ Skip to main content

SPECIES-LEVEL PARAPHYLY AND POLYPHYLY: Frequency, Causes, and Consequences, with Insights from Animal Mitochondrial DNA

Overview of attention for article published in Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution & Systematics, November 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
1830 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1408 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
SPECIES-LEVEL PARAPHYLY AND POLYPHYLY: Frequency, Causes, and Consequences, with Insights from Animal Mitochondrial DNA
Published in
Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution & Systematics, November 2003
DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132421
Authors

Daniel J. Funk, Kevin E. Omland

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,408 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 37 3%
United States 29 2%
Germany 10 <1%
Canada 10 <1%
France 7 <1%
Spain 6 <1%
United Kingdom 5 <1%
Japan 4 <1%
Colombia 4 <1%
Other 40 3%
Unknown 1256 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 324 23%
Researcher 299 21%
Student > Master 179 13%
Student > Bachelor 110 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 81 6%
Other 279 20%
Unknown 136 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 987 70%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 114 8%
Environmental Science 63 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 25 2%
Physics and Astronomy 10 <1%
Other 33 2%
Unknown 176 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2021.
All research outputs
#3,167,841
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution & Systematics
#345
of 898 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,111
of 58,856 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution & Systematics
#10
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 898 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,856 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.