The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Lessons in reducing volcano risk
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nature, July 1993
|
DOI | 10.1038/364277a0 |
Authors |
Robert I. Tilling, Peter W. Lipman |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
New Zealand | 2 | 4% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 47 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 11 | 22% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 14% |
Lecturer | 5 | 10% |
Student > Master | 5 | 10% |
Other | 9 | 18% |
Unknown | 4 | 8% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 36 | 72% |
Environmental Science | 3 | 6% |
Mathematics | 1 | 2% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 6 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2024.
All research outputs
#5,545,000
of 25,714,183 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#61,131
of 98,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,530
of 18,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#75
of 173 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,714,183 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,575 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.6. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 18,868 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 173 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.