↓ Skip to main content

外用爪白癬治療薬の特性比較

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Medical Mycology, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#19 of 146)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
外用爪白癬治療薬の特性比較
Published in
Japanese Journal of Medical Mycology, January 2016
DOI 10.3314/mmj.16-00020
Pubmed ID
Authors

島村 剛, 宮前 亜紀子, 今井 絢美, 平栁 こず恵, 岩永 知幸, 久保田 信雄, 澁谷 和俊

Abstract

Two topical therapeutic agents were approved in Japan from 2015 to 2016, adding new options for onychomycosis therapy in the clinical field. In order to confirm the differences of formulation properties and nail pharmacokinetics between 5% luliconazole solution and 10% efinaconazole solution, drug concentration and antifungal activity in the nail were measured after topical treatment using human nail plates. In the in vitro permeation study, concentration of each drug was measured in the transversely sliced nail after single treatment with the two topical therapeutic agents. The results showed that concentration of luliconazole is higher than that of efinaconazole at all nail layers, differing by 1.7-8.4 times at each measurement point. Next, we examined antifungal activities of each drug in sliced nail after 14-day topical treatment. Mean rates of formation of inhibition zones for 5% luliconazole solution and 10% efinaconazole solution were 71.0% and 12.6%, respectively, and were statistically different. These results show that the two topical therapeutic agents have different properties, and suggest that 5% luliconazole solution has good nail permeation and retention characteristics. Moreover, luliconazole was found to retain enough antifungal activity in the nail plate against Trichophyton spp. after treatment with the topical agent.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 40%
Other 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2018.
All research outputs
#8,454,279
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Medical Mycology
#19
of 146 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,334
of 402,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Medical Mycology
#5
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 146 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,226 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.