↓ Skip to main content

History of Science and Scientist

Overview of attention for article published in Kodo Keiryogaku (The Japanese Journal of Behaviormetrics), January 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#8 of 114)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
History of Science and Scientist
Published in
Kodo Keiryogaku (The Japanese Journal of Behaviormetrics), January 2004
DOI 10.2333/jbhmk.31.107
Authors

Masaki TAKAHASHI

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2020.
All research outputs
#6,702,103
of 26,565,554 outputs
Outputs from Kodo Keiryogaku (The Japanese Journal of Behaviormetrics)
#8
of 114 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,590
of 147,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Kodo Keiryogaku (The Japanese Journal of Behaviormetrics)
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,565,554 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 114 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 147,361 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them