The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Gastric rupture after overeating
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nihon Rinsho Geka Gakkai Zasshi (Journal of Japan Surgical Association), January 2008
|
DOI | 10.3919/jjsa.69.2229 |
Authors |
Masashi HATTORI, Ichiro HONDA, Hidenobu MATSUSITA, Daisuke KOBAYASI, Osamu OHKOCHI, Kenji TSUBOI |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 8 | 21% |
United States | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 29 | 76% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 38 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,176,615
of 26,557,909 outputs
Outputs from Nihon Rinsho Geka Gakkai Zasshi (Journal of Japan Surgical Association)
#2
of 183 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,270
of 173,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nihon Rinsho Geka Gakkai Zasshi (Journal of Japan Surgical Association)
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,557,909 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 183 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,450 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them