↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of terrestrial carbon cycle models with atmospheric CO2 measurements: Results from transient simulations considering increasing CO2, climate, and land‐use effects

Overview of attention for article published in Global Biogeochemical Cycles, November 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
79 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of terrestrial carbon cycle models with atmospheric CO2 measurements: Results from transient simulations considering increasing CO2, climate, and land‐use effects
Published in
Global Biogeochemical Cycles, November 2002
DOI 10.1029/2001gb001426
Authors

R. J. Dargaville, M. Heimann, A. D. McGuire, I. C. Prentice, D. W. Kicklighter, F. Joos, J. S. Clein, G. Esser, J. Foley, J. Kaplan, R. A. Meier, J. M. Melillo, B. Moore, N. Ramankutty, T. Reichenau, A. Schloss, S. Sitch, H. Tian, L. J. Williams, U. Wittenberg

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Kuwait 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Poland 1 1%
Unknown 79 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 32%
Professor 11 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 12%
Other 6 7%
Student > Master 5 6%
Other 15 18%
Unknown 11 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 35 41%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 18 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 12%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Linguistics 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 15 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2012.
All research outputs
#8,221,807
of 24,633,436 outputs
Outputs from Global Biogeochemical Cycles
#1,011
of 1,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,828
of 133,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Biogeochemical Cycles
#15
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,633,436 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,720 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 133,806 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.