The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Study on the Transformation of Former Castle Towns by the Introduction of Railways
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PAPERS OF THE RESEARCH MEETING ON THE CIVIL ENGINEERING HISTORY IN JAPAN, June 2010
|
| DOI | 10.11532/journalhs1981.7.113 |
| Authors |
Yohji Niitani, Kayo Tsutsumi |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 13 | 38% |
| Unknown | 21 | 62% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 34 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2020.
All research outputs
#1,527,680
of 26,563,746 outputs
Outputs from PAPERS OF THE RESEARCH MEETING ON THE CIVIL ENGINEERING HISTORY IN JAPAN
#1
of 38 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,821
of 108,851 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PAPERS OF THE RESEARCH MEETING ON THE CIVIL ENGINEERING HISTORY IN JAPAN
#1
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,563,746 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 38 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one scored the same or higher as 37 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,851 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.