↓ Skip to main content

アンケート調査に基づく御嶽山2014年9月27日噴火の降灰域

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Geological Society of Japan, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
アンケート調査に基づく御嶽山2014年9月27日噴火の降灰域
Published in
Journal of the Geological Society of Japan, July 2017
DOI 10.5575/geosoc.2016.0056
Authors

竹下 欣宏, 桐生 和樹, 花井 嘉夫, 北澤 夏樹, 川上 明宏

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2017.
All research outputs
#16,762,048
of 26,402,896 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Geological Society of Japan
#426
of 624 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,324
of 332,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Geological Society of Japan
#5
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,402,896 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 624 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,470 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.