The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Prediction of Mortality by High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein and Brain Natriuretic Peptide in Patients With Dilated Cardiomyopathy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Circulation Journal, January 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1253/circj.70.857 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chitose Ishikawa, Takayoshi Tsutamoto, Masanori Fujii, Hiroshi Sakai, Toshinari Tanaka, Minoru Horie |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 12 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 23% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 15% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Researcher | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 3 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 77% |
| Unknown | 3 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2017.
All research outputs
#15,177,296
of 25,391,066 outputs
Outputs from Circulation Journal
#1,155
of 2,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,359
of 171,794 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation Journal
#42
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,391,066 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,278 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,794 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.