↓ Skip to main content

右半球損傷により著明な錯文法を呈した1例

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Neuropsychology, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
右半球損傷により著明な錯文法を呈した1例
Published in
Japanese Journal of Neuropsychology, October 2017
DOI 10.20584/neuropsychology.17006
Authors

浦野 雅世, 石榑 なつみ, 谷 永穂子, 中尾 真理, 三村 將

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2023.
All research outputs
#17,861,983
of 26,163,973 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Neuropsychology
#20
of 34 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#216,775
of 337,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Neuropsychology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,163,973 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one scored the same or higher as 14 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,381 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them