The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Ghost-fishing ability decreasing over time for lost bottom-gillnet and estimation of total number of mortality
|
---|---|
Published in |
NIPPON SUISAN GAKKAISHI, January 2004
|
DOI | 10.2331/suisan.70.728 |
Authors |
TOSHIKO NAKASHIMA, TATSURO MATSUOKA |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 2 | 20% |
Researcher | 2 | 20% |
Professor | 1 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 10% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 3 | 30% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 30% |
Engineering | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2017.
All research outputs
#3,895,047
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from NIPPON SUISAN GAKKAISHI
#23
of 891 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,232
of 145,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age from NIPPON SUISAN GAKKAISHI
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 891 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 145,438 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them