↓ Skip to main content

Microbial consortia of gorgonian corals from the Aleutian islands

Overview of attention for article published in FEMS Microbiology Ecology, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Microbial consortia of gorgonian corals from the Aleutian islands
Published in
FEMS Microbiology Ecology, January 2011
DOI 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2010.01033.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael A. Gray, Robert P. Stone, Molly R. McLaughlin, Christina A. Kellogg

Abstract

Gorgonians make up the majority of corals in the Aleutian archipelago and provide critical fish habitat in areas of economically important fisheries. The microbial ecology of the deep-sea gorgonian corals Paragorgea arborea, Plumarella superba, and Cryogorgia koolsae was examined with culture-based and 16S rRNA gene-based techniques. Six coral colonies (two per species) were collected. Samples from all corals were cultured, and clone libraries were constructed from P. superba and C. koolsae. Cultured bacteria were dominated by the Gammaproteobacteria, especially Vibrionaceae, with other phyla comprising <6% of the isolates. The clone libraries showed dramatically different bacterial communities between corals of the same species collected at different sites, with no clear pattern of conserved bacterial consortia. Two of the clone libraries (one from each coral species) were dominated by Tenericutes, with Alphaproteobacteria dominating the remaining sequences. The other libraries were more diverse and had a more even distribution of bacterial phyla, showing more similarity between genera than within coral species. Here we report the first microbiological characterization of P. arborea, P. superba, and C. koolsae.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 2 3%
Malaysia 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
France 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Philippines 1 1%
Unknown 70 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 21%
Student > Master 9 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Student > Postgraduate 5 6%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 12 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 50%
Environmental Science 11 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 12%
Unspecified 2 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 3%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 13 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2014.
All research outputs
#20,656,820
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from FEMS Microbiology Ecology
#2,314
of 2,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,429
of 193,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age from FEMS Microbiology Ecology
#20
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,687 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,501 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.