The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Superoxide-generating enzymes NADPH oxidases, potential targets of drug therapy: various mechanisms for regulation of their expression
|
---|---|
Published in |
Folia Pharmacologica Japonica, January 2013
|
DOI | 10.1254/fpj.142.285 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Masato Katsuyama |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2014.
All research outputs
#5,701,233
of 22,760,687 outputs
Outputs from Folia Pharmacologica Japonica
#108
of 782 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,243
of 280,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Folia Pharmacologica Japonica
#2
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,760,687 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 782 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,911 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.