↓ Skip to main content

Chimpanzees and Humans Mimic Pupil-Size of Conspecifics

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
9 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
86 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
165 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Chimpanzees and Humans Mimic Pupil-Size of Conspecifics
Published in
PLOS ONE, August 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0104886
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mariska E. Kret, Masaki Tomonaga, Tetsuro Matsuzawa

Abstract

Group-living typically provides benefits to individual group members but also confers costs. To avoid incredulity and betrayal and allow trust and cooperation, individuals must understand the intentions and emotions of their group members. Humans attend to other's eyes and from gaze and pupil-size cues, infer information about the state of mind of the observed. In humans, pupil-size tends to mimic that of the observed. Here we tested whether pupil-mimicry exists in our closest relative, the chimpanzee (P. troglodytes). We conjectured that if pupil-mimicry has adaptive value, e.g. to promote swift communication of inner states and facilitate shared understanding and coordination, pupil-mimicry should emerge within but not across species. Pupillometry data was collected from human and chimpanzee subjects while they observed images of the eyes of both species with dilating/constricting pupils. Both species showed enhanced pupil-mimicry with members of their own species, with effects being strongest in humans and chimpanzee mothers. Pupil-mimicry may be deeply-rooted, but probably gained importance from the point in human evolution where the morphology of our eyes became more prominent. Humans' white sclera surrounding the iris, and the fine muscles around their eyes facilitate non-verbal communication via eye signals.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 2 1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 154 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 19%
Student > Bachelor 25 15%
Researcher 23 14%
Student > Master 18 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 26 16%
Unknown 32 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 61 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 13%
Neuroscience 17 10%
Social Sciences 8 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 3%
Other 15 9%
Unknown 38 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2022.
All research outputs
#904,507
of 26,538,386 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#11,627
of 231,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,407
of 247,642 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#276
of 4,808 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,538,386 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 231,252 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,642 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,808 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.