The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effects of phase proprioceptive training on balance in patients with chronic stroke
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Physical Therapy Science, May 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1589/jpts.29.839 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Seung Hun Chae, You Lim Kim, Suk Min Lee |
| Abstract |
[Purpose] This study aimed to investigate the effect of phase proprioceptive training on balance in patients with chronic stroke. [Subjects and Methods] Participants included 30 patients with stroke who were randomly assigned to the proprioceptive training group (n=15) or control group (n=15). Participants in the proprioceptive training group underwent proprioceptive training and received general physical therapy each for a total of 20 thirty-minute sessions, five times per week, during a period of four weeks; the control group received general physical therapy for a total of 20 sixty-minute sessions, five times per week, during a period of four weeks. [Results] All participants were evaluated with the Berg Balance Scale, Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, and Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale instrument before and after intervention. After training, the differences in BBS, TUG, and ABC scores in the proprioceptive group were significantly greater than those in the control group. [Conclusion] In conclusion, proprioceptive training was effective on balance ability. Therefore, proprioceptive training may be efficient when combining general physical therapy with phase proprioceptive training for patients with impairments of balance. Further research is needed to investigate proprioceptive training methods. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 29% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 14% |
| Mexico | 1 | 14% |
| Turkey | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 100 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 28% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 3% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Unknown | 38 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 31 | 31% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 13% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 5% |
| Sports and Recreations | 4 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 38 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2022.
All research outputs
#1,900,510
of 26,523,931 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Physical Therapy Science
#117
of 1,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,152
of 330,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Physical Therapy Science
#4
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,523,931 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,755 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,319 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.